Клинико-анатомические особенности пациенток с апикальным пролапсом

1. Brown H.W., Hegde A., Huebner M., Neels H., Barnes H.C., Marquini G.V. et al. International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2022; 33(2): 173-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05018-z
2. Zumrutbas A.E. Understanding pelvic organ prolapse: a comprehensive review of etiology, epidemiology, comorbidities, and evaluation. Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025; 6: 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/siuj6010006
3. Hadizadeh-Talasaz Z., Khadivzadeh T., Mohajeri T., Sadeghi M. Worldwide prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran. J. Public. Health. 2024; 53(3): 524-38. https://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i3.15134
4. Смольнова Т.Ю., Красный А.М., Чупрынин В.Д., Садекова А.А., Чурсин В.В., Тамбиева Ф.Р. Способ хирургической коррекции пролапса гениталий у пациентки со сниженным уровнем экспрессии гена CACNA1C в круглых связках матки. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 12: 234-41.
5. Komesu Y.M., Dinwiddie D.L., Richter H.E., Lukacz E.S., Sung V.W., Siddiqui N.Y. et al. Defining the relationship between vaginal and urinary microbiomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 222(2): 154.e1-e10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.011
6. Kowalski J.T., Barber M.D., Klerkx W.M., Grzybowska M.E., Toozs-Hobson P., Rogers R.G. et al. International urogynecological consultation chapter 4.1: definition of outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2023; 34(11): 2689-99. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05660-9
7. Patnam R., Edenfield A., Swift S. Defining normal apical vaginal support: a relook at the POSST study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2020; 30(1): 47-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3681-8
8. Trutnovsky G., Robledo K.P., Shek K.L., Dietz H.P. Definition of apical descent in women with and without previous hysterectomy: a retrospective analysis. PLOS One. 2019; 14(3): e0213617. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213617
9. Dietz H.P., Mann K.P. What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2014; 25(4): 451-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2307-4
10. Oh S., Shin E.K., Lee S.Y., Kim M.J., Lee Y., Jeon M.J. Anatomic criterion for clinically relevant apical prolapse in urogynecology populations. Urogynecology. 2023; 29(11): 860-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001383
11. Dubinskaya E.D., Gasparov A.S., Babichev A.I., Kolesnikova S.N. Improving of long-term follow-up after cystocele repair. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2022; 51(2): 102278. https://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102278
12. Szymanowski P., Szepieniec W. K., Szweda H., Ligeza J., Sadakierska-Chudy A. Apical defect - the essence of cystocele pathogenesis? Ginekol Pol. 2024; 95 (7): 511-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2023.0022
13. Haylen B.T., Maher C.F., Barber M.D., Camargo S., Dandolu V., Digesu A. et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int. Urogynecol. J. 2016; 27(2): 165-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2932-1
14. Barber M.D., Walters M.D., Bump R.C. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 193(1): 103-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025
15. Gray T., Strickland S., Pooranawattanakul S., Li W., Campbell P., Jones G. et al. What are the concerns and goals of women attending a urogynaecology clinic? Content analysis of free-text data from an electronic pelvic floor assessment questionnaire (ePAQ-PF). Int. Urogynecol. J. 2019; 30(1): 33-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3697-0
16. Cichowski S., Grzybowska M. E., Halder G. E., Jansen S., Gold D., Espuña M. et al. International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2022; 33(10): 2603-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05315-1
17. Безменко А.А., Захаров И.С., Беженарь В.Ф., Староверова А.С., Баграмян Э.А., Иванова О.А., Капитанова М.В. Анатомо-функциональные особенности тазового дна женщин в различные возрастные периоды. Акушерство и гинекология. 2025; 6: 131-8.
18. Tegerstedt G., Miedel A., Maehle-Schmidt M., Nyren O., Hammarström M. A short-form questionnaire identified genital organ prolapse. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2005; 58(1): 41-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.008
19. Collins S.A., O'Shea M., Dykes N., Ramm O., Edenfield A., Shek K.L. et al. International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2021; 32(8): 2011-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04875-y
20. Hong C.X., Nandikanti L., Shrosbree B., Delancey J.O., Chen L. Variations in structural support site failure patterns by prolapse size on stress 3D MRI. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2023; 34(8): 1923-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05482-9
21. Маринкин И.О., Ракитин Ф.А., Волчек А.В., Солуянов М.Ю., Кулешов В.М., Макаров К.Ю., Соколова Т.М., Нимаев В.В., Айдагулова С.В. Проявления недифференцированной дисплазии соединительной ткани и прогнозирование рецидивов при хирургической коррекции переднего пролапса тазовых органов у женщин. Акушерство и гинекология. 2024; 12: 70-9.

Поступила 11.06.2025

Принята в печать 03.07.2025