Наружный акушерский поворот плода в современном акушерстве

1. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Тазовое предлежание плода. М.; 2024. 33 с.
2. Серов В.Н., Сухих Г.Т., Курцер М.А., Радзинский В.Е., ред. Акушерство. Национальное руководство. 3-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2026. 1048 с.
3. Cobec I.M., Varzaru V.B., Kövendy T., Kuban L., Eftenoiu A.E., Moatar A.E. et al. External cephalic version-A chance for vaginal delivery at breech presentation. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(11): 1619. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111619
4. Lei L., Fang Z., Xu C., Wang Z., Li H., Ma L. Effect of anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: GRADE- assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Syst. Rev. 2024; 13(1): 202. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02616-y
5. Borgmeier F., Horst de Cuestas S., Pruss M., Fath N., Hagenbeck C. Neonatal outcome following external cephalic version (ECV)-comparison between vaginal birth after successful ECV and elective caesarean section after unsuccessful ECV. J. Clin. Med. 2024; 13(13): 3837. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133837
6. de Wolff M.G., Ladekarl M., Sparholt L., Lykke J.A. Rebozo and external cephalic version in breech presentation (RECEIVE): a randomised controlled study. BJOG. 2022; 129(10): 1666-75. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17111
7. Sánchez-Romero J., Gallego-Pozuelo R.M., Blanco-Carnero J.E., Herrera-Giménez J., Araico-Rodríguez F., Guijarro-Campillo A.R. et al. External cephalic version outcomes with tocolysis and sedation: a 10-year retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2025. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70711
8. Bevilacqua E., Jani J.C., Meli F., Carlin A., Bonanni G., Rimbault M. et al. Pregnancy outcomes in breech presentation at term: a comparison between 2 third level birth center protocols. AJOG Glob. Rep. 2022; 2(4): 100086. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100086
9. Fernández-Carrasco F.J., Cristóbal-Cañadas D., Gómez-Salgado J., Vázquez-Lara J.M., Rodríguez-Díaz L., Parrón-Carreño T. Maternal and fetal risks of planned vaginal breech delivery vs planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Glob. Health. 2022; 12: 04055. https://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.04055
10. Дударева Ю.А., Антонова С.А., Живетьева Н.В. Наружный поворот плода на головку в современном акушерстве: оценка эффективности и безопасности. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2023; 23(6‑2): 162‑6.
11. Шрамко С.В., Леонова Е.С., Алексеева М.В. Наружный акушерский поворот плода. Мать и дитя в Кузбассе. 2024; 1(96): 97-100.
12. Kwiatek M., Geca T., Stupak A., Kwasniewski W., Mlak R., Kwasniewska A. External cephalic version - single-center experience. Ginekol. Pol. 2024; 95(10): 779-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.5603/gpl.99736
13. Семенова Э.Р. Наружный поворот плода на головку при тазовом и поперечном положении плода. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 11: 192-6.
14. Hakem E., Lindow S.W., O'Connell M.P., von Bünau G. External cephalic version - a 10-year review of practice. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2021; 258: 414-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.044
15. Shanahan M.M., Martingano D.J., Gray C.J. External cephalic version. 2023 Dec 13. In: StatPearls
16. Andre N., Hamad A.A., Mastrolia S.A., Baumfeld Y., Sheiner E., Bernstein E.H. et al. Enhancing external cephalic version success: insights from an Israeli tertiary center. J. Perinat. Med. 2025; 53(4): 517-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0546
17. Levin G., Ezra Y., Weill Y., Kabiri D., Pollack R.N., Rottenstreich A. Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2021; 34(18): 3008-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1677589
18. Riemma G., Schiattarella A., La Verde M., Cianci S., Savoia F., De Franciscis P. et al. Usefulness of atosiban for tocolysis during external cephalic version: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2021; 258: 86-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.053
19. Athiel Y., Girault A., Le Ray C., Goffinet F. Association between hospitals' cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation and their success rates for external cephalic version. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2022; 270: 156-63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.01.007
20. Yi J., Tang Z., Chen X., Zhang X., Zhang B., Liu D. et al. Predictive factors for a successful external cephalic version: an observational study of four years' experience in China. Ann. Med. 2025; 57(1): 2598905. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2598905
21. Cillard L., Verhaeghe C., Spiers A., Madzou S., Descamps P., Legendre G. et al. External cephalic version: predictors for success. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 50(9): 102165. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102165
22. Londero A.P., Xholli A., Massarotti C., Fruscalzo A., Cagnacci A. Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2023; 308(4): 1127-37. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06763-2
23. Unno S., Ogawa K., Nukariya A., Umehara N., Sago H. Predictive factors for successful external cephalic version with regional anesthesia. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2023; 49(5): 1335-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15615
24. External cephalic version: ACOG Practice Bulletin, number 221. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 135(5): e203-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003837
25. Lomas S., Minton Z., Daniels J.P. Systematic review of the effectiveness of remifentanil in term breech pregnancies undergoing external cephalic version. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2023; 54: 103649. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2023.103649
26. Kabiri D., Haj Yahya R., Yahalomi S., Ezra Y. Impact of full vs empty urinary bladder on external cephalic version success: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM. 2023; 5(7): 100991. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100991
27. Yerrabelli R.S., Lee C., Palsgaard P.K., Lauinger A.R., Abdelsalam O., Jennings V. Prediction models for successful external cephalic version: an updated systematic review. Am. J. Perinatol. 2024; 41(S01): e3210-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2211-4806
28. Dong T., Chen X., Zhao B., Jiang Y., Chen Y., Lv M. et al. Development of prediction models for successful external cephalic version and delivery outcome. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2022; 305(1): 63-75. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06115-6
29. Newman R.B., Peacock B.S., VanDorsten J.P., Hunt H.H. Predicting success of external cephalic version. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993; 169(2 Pt 1): 245-9; discussion 249-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(93)90071-p
30. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Резус-изоиммунизация. Гемолитическая болезнь плода. М.; 2024. 21 с.
31. Reicher L., Lavie A., Fouks Y., Isakov O., Attali E., Yogev Y. et al. Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021; 303(4): 911-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05819-5
32. Sánchez-Romero J., Gallego-Pozuelo R.M., Ortuño-Hernández C., Martínez-Zarco A., Barroso-Linares R., Araico-Rodríguez F. et al. Ultrasound assessment of breech engagement: breech progression angle and prediction of external cephalic version success. J. Clin. Med. 2025; 14(20): 7179. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207179
33. Youssef A., Brunelli E., Fiorentini M., Lenzi J., Pilu G., El-Balat A. Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 58(4): 609-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.23649
34. Dahl C.M., Zhang Y., Ong J.X., Yeh C., Son M., Miller E.S., Roy A., Grobman W.A. Patient characteristics associated with complications of external cephalic version. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM. 2021; 3(5): 100411. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100411
35. Matsui H., Ogawa K., Okamoto A., Sago H. Risk factors and outcomes of abnormal bleeding after external cephalic version. J. Perinat. Med. 2021; 49(6): 733-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0453
36. Engel O., Arnon S., Shechter Maor G., Schreiber H., Piura E., Markovitch O. The effect of external cephalic version on fetal circulation: a prospective cohort study. Children (Basel). 2023; 10(2): 354. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020354
37. Fitiri M., Papavasileiou D., Mesaric V., Syngelaki A., Akolekar R., Nicolaides K.H. Routine 36-week scan: diagnosis and outcome of abnormal fetal presentation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2025; 65(2): 154-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.29139
38. Tamura N., Takeda J., Suga Y., Kumagai A., Matsuzawa N., Yamamoto Y. et al. Reducing medical costs by adopting external cephalic version in a single perinatal center in Japan. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2025; 51(8): e70031. doi: 10.1111/jog.70031

Поступила 16.03.2026

Принята в печать 09.04.2026