Инвазивные методы предоперационной диагностики состояния регионарных лимфоколлекторов при раке молочной железы

1. Amin M.B., Edge S., Greene, F., Byrd D.R., Brookland R.K., Washington, M.K., Gershenwald J.E., Compton C.C., Hess K.R., Sullivan D.C., Jessup J.M., Brierley J.D., Gaspar L.E., Schilsky R.L., Balch C.M., Winchester D.P., Asare E.A., Madera M., Gress D.M., Meyer L.R. (eds.): AJCC Cancer Staging manual, 8 edn. American College of Surgeons, 2017.

2. del Riego J., Diaz-Ruiz M.J., Teixido M., Ribe J., Vilagran M., Canales L., Sentis M., Grup de Mama V-O-B: The impact of preoperative axillary ultrasonography in T1 breast tumours. Eur Radiol. 2016; 26(4): 1073–81.doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3901-2

3. Farrell T.P., Adams N.C., Stenson M., Carroll P.A., Griffin M., Connolly E.M., O’Keeffe S.A. The Z0011 Trial: Is this the end of axillary ultrasound in the pre- operative assessment of breast cancer patients? Eur Radiol. 2015; 25(9): 2682–7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3683-6.

4. Diepstraten S.C., Sever A.R., Buckens C.F., Veldhuis W.B., van Dalen T, van den Bosch M.A., Mali W.P., Verkooijen H.M. Value of preoperative ultrasound-guided axillary lymph node biopsy for preventing completion axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21(1): 51–9. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3229-6

5. Houssami N., Ciatto S., Turner R.M., Cody H.S., 3rd, Macaskill P. Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer: meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging the axilla. Ann Surg. 2011; 254(2): 243–51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821f1564.

6. Bhandari A., Xia E., Wang Y., Sindan N., Kc R., Guan Y., Lin Y.L., Wang X.,Zhang X., Wang O. Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy in newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer patients with suspicious node: a comparative accuracy survey of fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus core-needle biopsy. Am J Transl Res. 2018; 10(6): 1860–73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC6038083

7. Alam F., Naito K., Horiguchi J., Fukuda H., Tachikake T., Ito K.Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(2): 604–10. doi:10.1007/ s11684-009-0063-0

8. Ophir J., Cespedes I., Ponnekanti H., Yazdi Y., Li X. Elastography: a quantitativemethod for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991; 13(2): 111–34. doi: 10.1177/016173469101300201

9. Ophir J., Garra B., Kallel F., Konofagou E., Krouskop T., Righetti R., VargheseT. Elastographic imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000; 26 Suppl 1: S23–9. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(00)00156-3

10. Yang T., Niu J., Dang Y., Zhou Y., Cao Y., Zeng M., Lv M. An Innovative Ultrasound Strain Elastographic Method for the Differential Diagnosis of Breast Tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019; 45(1): 56–67. doi: 10.1016/j. ultrasmedbio.2018.08.025.

11. Graziano L., Bitencourt A.G., Cohen M.P., Guatelli C.S., Poli M.R., Souza J.A.,Marques E.F. Elastographic Evaluation of Indeterminate Breast Masses on Ultrasound. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017; 39(2): 72–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0036- 1597753

12. Lee S.H., Moon W.K., Cho N., Chang J.M., Moon H.G., Han W., Noh D.Y.,Lee J.C., Kim H.C., Lee K.B., Park IA. Shear-wave elastographic features of breast cancers: comparison with mechanical elasticity and histopathologic characteristics. Invest Radiol. 2014; 49(3): 147–55. doi: 10.1097/ RLI.0000000000000006.

13. Evans A., Whelehan P., Thomson K., McLean D., Brauer K., Purdie C., Baker L.,Jordan L., Rauchhaus P., Thompson A. Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology. 2012; 263(3): 673–7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111317.

14. Andrioli M., Persani L. Elastographic techniques of thyroid gland: current status.Endocrine. 2014; 46(3): 455–61. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0178-1.

15. Andrioli M., Valcavi R. The peculiar ultrasonographic and elastographic features of thyroid nodules after treatment with laser or radiofrequency: similarities and differences. Endocrine. 2014; 47(3): 967–8. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0241-y.

16. Dighe M., Kim J., Luo S., Kim Y. Utility of the ultrasound elastographic systolicthyroid stiffness index in reducing fine-needle aspirations. J Ultrasound Med. 2010; 29(4): 565–74. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.4.565

17. Magri F., Chytiris S., Capelli V., Gaiti M., Zerbini F., Carrara R., Malovini A.,Rotondi M., Bellazzi R., Chiovato L. Comparison of elastographic strain index and thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology in 631 thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98(12): 4790–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2672.

18. Hwang S.I., Lee H.J., Lee S.E., Hong S.K., Byun S.S., Choe G. ElastographicStrain Index in the Evaluation of Focal Lesions Detected With Transrectal Sonography of the Prostate Gland. J Ultrasound Med.2016; 35(5): 899–904. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.01071

19. Miyagawa T., Tsutsumi M., Matsumura T., Kawazoe N., Ishikawa S.,Shimokama T., Miyanaga N., Akaza H. Real-time elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: evaluation of elastographic moving images. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009; 39(6): 394–8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyp026.

20. Kim H., Hwang H.S. Elastographic measurement of the cervix during pregnancy:Current status and future challenges. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017; 60(1):1–7. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.1.1

21. Conti C.B., Cavalcoli F., Fraquelli M., Conte D., Massironi S. Ultrasoundelastographic techniques in focal liver lesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(9): 2647–56. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i9.2647.

22. Marginean C.O., Marginean C. Elastographic assessment of liver fibrosis inchildren: A prospective single center experience. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(8): e870–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.014

23. Morisaka H., Motosugi U., Ichikawa S., Sano K., Ichikawa T., Enomoto N.Association of splenic MR elastographic findings with gastroesophageal varices in patients with chronic liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 41(1):117– 24. doi: 10.1002/jmri.2450

24. Nadebaum D.P., Nicoll A.J., Sood S., Gorelik A., Gibson R.N. Variability of LiverShear Wave Measurements Using a New Ultrasound Elastographic Technique. J Ultrasound Med. 2018; 37(3): 647–56. doi: 10.1002/jum.14375

25. Sporea I., Mare R., Lupusoru R., Popescu A., Danila M., Bende F., Sirli R.Comparative study between four ultrasound Shear Waves Elastographic methods for liver fibrosis assessment. Med Ultrason. 2018; 20(3): 265–71. doi: 10.11152/ mu-1487.

26. Шолохов В.Н., Хакуринова Н.Д., Петровский А.В., Бердников С.Н.,Махотина М.С., Нечушкин М.И. Предоперационная диагностика состояния подмышечных лимфоузлов с использованием ультразвуко- вой эластографии и эластометрии у больных раком молочной желе- зы. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2015; (5S): 195–6.

27. Papadacci C., Bunting E.A., Konofagou E.E. 3D Quasi-Static UltrasoundElastography With Plane Wave In Vivo. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017; 36(2): 357–65. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2596706

28. Treece G., Lindop J., Chen L., Housden J., Prager R., Gee A. Real-timequasi-static ultrasound elastography. Interface Focus. 2011; 1(4): 540–52. doi:10.1098/rsfs.2011.0011

29. Varghese T. Quasi-Static Ultrasound Elastography. Ultrasound Clin. 2009; 4(3):323–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cult.2009.10.009

30. Park Y.M., Fornage B.D., Benveniste A.P., Fox P.S., Bassett R.L. Jr., Yang W.T. Strain elastography of abnormal axillary nodes in breast cancer patients does not improve diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional ultrasound alone. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203(6): 1371–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.12349

31. Choi J.J., Kang B.J., Kim S.H., Lee J.H., Jeong S.H., Yim H.W., Song B.J.,Jung S.S. Role of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 2011; 30(4): 429–36. doi:10.7863/jum.2011.30.4.429

32. Taylor K., O’Keeffe S., Britton P.D., Wallis M.G., Treece G.M., Housden J.,Parashar D., Bond S., Sinnatamby R. Ultrasound elastography as an adjuvant to conventional ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of axillary lymph nodes in suspected breast cancer: a pilot study. Clin Radiol. 2011; 66(11): 1064–71. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.015

33. Tsai W.C., Lin C.K., Wei H.K., Yu B.L., Hung C.F., Cheng S.H., Chen C.M.Sonographic elastography improves the sensitivity and specificity of axilla sampling in breast cancer: a prospective study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013; 39(6): 941–9. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.12.013

34. Youk J.H., Gweon H.M., Son E.J., Han K.H., Kim J.A. Diagnostic value ofcommercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23(10): 2695–2704. doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2873-3

35. Park C.S., Kim S.H., Jung N.Y., Choi J.J., Kang B.J., Jung H.S. Interobservervariability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions. Breast Cancer. 2015; 22(2): 153–160. doi:10.1007/s12282-013-0465-3

36. Yoon J.H., Kim M.H., Kim E.K., Moon H.J., Kwak J.Y., Kim M.J. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196(3): 730–6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4654.

37. Berg W.A., Mendelson E.B., Cosgrove D.O., Dore C.J., Gay J., Henry J.P., Cohen-Bacrie C. Quantitative Maximum Shear-Wave Stiffness of Breast Masses as a Predictor of Histopathologic Severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205(2): 448–55. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13448

38. Cosgrove D.O., Berg W.A., Dore C.J., Skyba D.M., Henry J.P., Gay J., Cohen-Bacrie C., Group B.E.S. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(5): 1023–32. doi:10.1007/s00330-011- 2340-y

39. Tourasse C., Denier J.F., Awada A., Gratadour A.C., Nessah-Bousquet K., Gay J.Elastography in the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes prior to dissection. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(11): 3154–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.031

Поступила 17.06.2109

Принята в печать 21.06.2019