Повышение эффективности программ ЭКО на основании определения копийности митохондриальной ДНК в трофэктодерме эмбрионов

1. Meczekalski B., Czyzyk A., Kunicki M., Podfigurna-Stopa A., Plociennik L., Jakiel G. et al. Fertility in women of late reproductive age: the role of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in its assessment. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2016; 39(11): 1259-65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0497-6.
2. Мишиева Н.Г. Лечение бесплодия у женщин позднего репродуктивного возраста. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2008; 8(5): 51-5.
3. Smith K.E., Buyalos R.P. The profound impact of patient age on pregnancy outcome after early detection of fetal cardiac activity. Fertil. Steril. 1996; 65(1): 35-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(2016)58024-8.
4. Королькова А.И., Мишиева Н.Г., Абубакиров А.Н., Павлова Ю.С., Имиева Т.Б. Антимюллеров гормон как показатель фертильности женщин позднего репродуктивного возраста. Проблемы репродукции. 2018; 24(2): 23-7.
5. Tsutsumi M., Fujiwara R., Nishizawa H., Ito M., Kogo H., Inagaki H. et al. Age-related decrease of meiotic cohesins in human oocytes. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5): e96710. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096710. eCollection 2014.
6. Lukaszuk K., Jakiel G., Kuczynski W., Pukszta S., Liss J., Plociennik L. et al. Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic testing of blastocysts aneuploidies in women of different ages. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2016; 23(1): 163-6.
7. Brezina P.R., Anchan R., Kearns W.G. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: what technology should you use and what are the differences? J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016; 33(7): 823-32.
8. Ma G.C., Chen H.F., Yang Y.S., Lin W.H., Tsai F.P., Lin C.F. et al. A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing. Mol. Cytogenet. 2016; 9: 25.
9. Fiorentino F., Bono S., Biricik A., Nuccitelli A., Cotroneo E., Cottone G. et al. Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Hum. Reprod. 2014; 29(12): 2802-13.
10. Rubio C., Bellver J., Rodrigoa L., Castillon G., Guillen A., Vidal C. et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized controlled study. Fertil. Steril. 2017; 107(5): 1122-9.
11. Fragouli E., McCaffrey C., Ravichandran K., Spath K., Grifo J.A., Munné S., Wells D. Clinical implications of mitochondrial DNA quantification on pregnancy outcomes: a blinded prospective non-selection study. Hum. Reprod. 2017; 32(11): 2340-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex292.
12. de Los Santos M.J., Diez Juan A., Mifsud A., Mercader A., Meseguer M., Rubio C., Pellicer A. Variables associated with mitochondrial copy number in human blastocysts: what can we learn from trophectoderm biopsies? Fertil. Steril. 2018; 109(1): 110-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.11.007.
13. Cagnone G.L., Tsai T.S., Makanji Y., Matthews P., Gould J., Bonkowski M.S. et al. Restoration of normal embryogenesis by mitochondrial supplementation in pig oocytes exhibiting mitochondrial DNA deficiency. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6: 23229.
14. Королькова А.И., Мишиева Н.Г., Бурменская О.В., Екимов А.Н., Абубакиров А.Н., Богатырева Х.А. Современные методы селекции эмбрионов при проведении программ вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2018; 2: 13-8.
15. Zhou Q., Li H., Li H., Nakagawa A., Lin J.L., Lee E.S. et al. Mitochondrial endonuclease G mediates breakdown of paternal mitochondria upon fertilization. Science. 2016; 353(6297): 394-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4777.
16. Fragouli E., Spath K., Alfarawati S., Kaper F., Craig A., Michel C.E. et al. Altered levels of mitochondrial DNA are associated with female age, aneuploidy, and provide an independent measure of embryonic implantation potential. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11(6): e1005241. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005241.
17. Ravichandran K., McCaffrey C., Grifo J., Morales A., Perloe M., S. Munne S. et al. Mitochondrial DNA quantification as a tool for embryo viability assessment: retrospective analysis of data from single euploid blastocyst transfers. Hum. Reprod. 2017; 32(6): 1282-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex070.
18. Ogino M., Tsubamoto H., Sakata K., Oohama N., Hayakawa H., Kojima T. et al. Mitochondrial DNA copy number in cumulus cells is a strong predictor of obtaining good-quality embryos after IVF. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016; 33(3): 367-71.
19. Boucret L., Chao de la Barca J.M., Morinière C., Desquiret V., Ferré-L’Hôtellier V., Descamps P. et al. Relationship between diminished ovarian reserve and mitochondrial biogenesis in cumulus cells. Hum. Reprod. 2015; 30(7): 1653-64.
20. Desquiret-Dumas V., Clément A., Seegers V., Boucret L., Ferré-L’Hotellier V., Bouet P.E. et al. The mitochondrial DNA content of cumulus granulosa cells is linked to embryo quality. Hum. Reprod. 2017; 32(3): 607-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew341.
21. Gardner D.K., Schoolcraft W.B. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R., Mortimer D., eds. Toward reproductive gertainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999 . London: Parthenon Publishing; 1999: 378-88.
22. Dagan Wells. Mitochondrial DNA quantity as a biomarker for blastocyst implantation potential. Fertil. Steril. 2017; 108(5): 742-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.007.
23. Leese H.J. Quiet please, do not disturb: a hypothesis of embryo metabolism and viability. Bioessays. 2002: 24(9): 845-9.
24. Баранов В.С., Кузнецова Т.В. Цитогенетика эмбрионального развития человека. СПб.: Н-Л; 2007: 78-9.

Поступила 30.11.2018

Принята в печать 07.12.2018