Хромосомный мозаицизм эмбрионов человека: вариант нормального развития или патология?

1. Boklage C.E. Survival probability of human conceptions from fertilization to term. Int. J. Fertil. 1990; 35(2): 75, 79-94.
2. Cram D.S., Leigh D., Handyside A., Rechitsky L., Xu K., Harton G. et al. PGDIS position statement on the transfer of mosaic embryos 2019. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2019; 39(S.1): e1-e4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.06.012
3. Vera-Rodríguez M., Michel C.-E., Mercader A., Bladon A.J., Rodrigo L., Kokocinski F. et al. Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing. Fertil. Steril. 2016; 105(4): 1047-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.022
4. Rodrigo L., Clemente-Ciscar M., Campos-Galindo I., Peinado V., Simón C., Rubio C. Characteristics of the IVF cycle that contribute to the incidence of mosaicism. Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(10): 1151. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11101151
5. Schmitz J., Watrin E., Lénárt P., Mechtler K., Peters J.M. Sororin is required for stable binding of cohesin to chromatin and for sister chromatid cohesion in interphase. Curr. Biol. 2007; 17(7): 630-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.029
6. Kitajima T.S., Kawashima S.A., Watanabe Y. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature. 2004; 427(6974): 510-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02312
7. Webster A., Schuh M. Mechanisms of aneuploidy in human eggs. Trends Cell Biol. 2017; 27(1): 55-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2016.09.002
8. Смирнова А.А., Зыряева Н.А., Аншина М.Б. Возрастные изменения и риск хромосомных аномалий в ооцитах человека (обзор литературы). Проблемы репродукции. 2019; 25(2): 16-26.
9. Harris K., Fitzgerald O., Paul R.C., Macaldowie A., Lee E., Chambers G.M. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2014. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, the University of New South Wales; 2016. 85 p. Available at: https://www.unsw.edu.au/content/dam/pdfs/medicine-health/npesu/research-reports/2023-12-npesu/2024-01-Assisted-reproductive-technology-in-Australia-and-New-Zealand-2014.pdf
10. Moghadam A.R.E., Moghadam M.T., Hemadi M., Saki G. Oocyte quality and aging. JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2022; 26(1): 105-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20210026
11. Bolton H., Graham S.J.L., Van der Aa N., Kumar P., Theunis K., Fernandez Gallardo E. et al. Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential. Nat. Commun. 2016; 7: 11165. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11165
12. Yang M., Rito T., Metzger J., Naftaly J., Soman R., Hu J. et al. Depletion of aneuploid cells in human embryos and gastruloids. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021; 23(4): 314-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00660-7
13. Taylor T.H., Gitlin S.A., Patrick J.L., Crain J.L., Wilson J.M., Griffin D.K. The origin, mechanisms, incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2014; 20(4): 571-81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu016
14. Harton G.L., Cinnioglu C., Fiorentino F. Current experience concerning mosaic embryos diagnosed during preimplantation genetic screening. Fertil. Steril. 2017; 107(5): 1113-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.016
15. Kahraman S., Cetinkaya M., Yuksel B., Yesil M., Cetinkaya C.P. Birth of a baby with mosaicism resulting from a known mosaic embryo transfer: a case report. Hum. Reprod. 2020; 35(3): 727-33. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez309
16. Maxwell S.M., Colls P., Hodes-Wertz B., McCulloh D.H., McCaffrey C., Wells D. et al. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing. Fertil. Steril. 2016; 106(6): 1414-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.017
17. Capalbo A., Poli M., Rienzi L., Girardi L., Patassini C., Fabiani M. et al. Mosaic human preimplantation embryos and their developmental potential in a prospective, non-selection clinical trial. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2021; 108(12): 2238-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.11.002
18. Popovic M., Dheedene A., Christodoulou C., Taelman J., Dhaenens L., Van Nieuwerburgh F. et al. Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate challenge of preimplantation genetic testing? Hum. Reprod. 2018; 33(7): 1342-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey106
19. Viotti M., Victor A.R., Barnes F.L., Zouves C.G., Besser A.G., Grifo J.A. et al. Using outcome data from one thousand mosaic embryo transfers to formulate an embryo ranking system for clinical use. Fertil. Steril. 2021; 115(5): 1212-24. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.041
20. Макарова Н.П., Екимов А.Н., Кулакова Е.В., Драпкина Ю.С., Сысоева А.П., Краснова Н.А., Калинина Е.А. Особенности мозаицизма у эмбрионов человека в программах лечения бесплодия методами вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021; 7: 144-51.
21. Zhang L., Wei D., Zhu Y., Gao Y., Yan J., Chen Z.J. Rates of live birth after mosaic embryo transfer compared with euploid embryo transfer. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019; 36(2): 165-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1322-2
22. Girardi L., Figliuzzi M., Poli M., Serdarogullari M., Patassini C., Caroselli S. et al. The use of copy number loads to designate mosaicism in blastocyst stage PGT-A cycles: fewer is better. Hum. Reprod. 2023; 38(5): 981-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead049
23. Zhai F., Kong S., Song S., Guo Q., Ding L., Zhang J. et al. Human embryos harbor complex mosaicism with broad presence of aneuploid cells during early development. Cell Discov. 2024; 10(1): 98. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41421-024-00719-3
24. Starostik M.R., Sosina O.A., McCoy R.C. Single-cell analysis of human embryos reveals diverse patterns of aneuploidy and mosaicism. Genome Res. 2020; 30(6): 814-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.262774.120
25. Zhou F., Wang R., Yuan P., Ren Y., Mao Y., Li R. et al. Reconstituting the transcriptome and DNA methylome landscapes of human implantation. Nature. 2019; 572(7771): 660-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1500-0
26. Sheltzer J.M., Torres E.M., Dunham M.J., Amon A. Transcriptional consequences of aneuploidy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012; 109(31): 12644-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209227109
27. Greco E., Minasi M.G., Fiorentino F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015; 373(21): 2089-90. https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1500421
28. Capalbo A., Poli M., Rienzi L., Girardi L., Patassini C., Fabiani M. Mosiac preimplantation embryos and their developmental potential in a prospective, non-selection clinical trial. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2021; 108(12): 2238-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.11.002
29. Rosenbluth E.M., Shelton D.N., Wells L.M., Sparks A.E.T., Van Voorhis B.J. Human embryos secrete microRNAs into culture media--a potential biomarker for implantation. Fertil. Steril. 2014; 101(5): 1493-500. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.058
30. Timofeeva A.V., Fedorov I.S., Shamina M.A., Chagovets V.V., Makarova N.P., Kalinina E.A. et al. Clinical relevance of secreted small noncoding RNAs in an embryo implantation potential prediction at morula and blastocyst development stages. Life (Basel). 2021; 11(12): 1328. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11121328
31. Coll L., Parriego M., Palacios G., Garcia S., Boada M., Coroleu B. et al. Do reproductive history and information given through genetic counselling influence patients' decisions on mosaic embryo transfer? Prenat. Diagn. 2022; 42(13): 1674-82. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6267
32. Grati F.R., Gallazzi G., Branca L., Maggi F., Simoni G., Yaron Y. An evidence-based scoring system for prioritizing mosaic aneuploid embryos following preimplantation genetic screening. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2018; 36(4): 442-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.01.005
33. Zhang Y.X., Chen J.J., Nabu S., Yeung Q.S.Y., Li Y., Tan J.H. et al. The pregnancy outcome of mosaic embryo transfer: a prospective multicenter study and meta-analysis. Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(9): 973. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11090973
34. Mourad A., Antaki R., Bissonnette F., Baini O.A., Saadeh B., Jamal W. Evidence-based clinical prioritization of embryos with mosaic results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2021; 38(11): 2849-60. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02279-6
35. Ma Y., Liu L.-W., Liu Y., Shi G., Ai X., Hou W. et al. Which type of chromosomal mosaicism is compatible for embryo transfer: a systematical review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2022; 306(6): 1901-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06511-6
36. Hong Y.M., Kim S.H., Park H.J., Ryu H.M., Cha D.H., Kim M.Y. et al. Prenatal ultrasound findings and chromosomal outcomes of pregnancies with mosaic embryo transfer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(24): 2795. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14242795
37. Wang Y., Wang Z., Wu X., Ling X., Zhang J., Liu M. Clinical outcomes of subtypes of mosaic single aneuploid embryos after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2023; 40(3): 639-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02728-9
38. Hallisey S.M., Koniares K., Taggar A., Godiwala P.N., Grow D.R. Assessing patient compliance with recommended prenatal testing and identifying pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after mosaic embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 2022; 118(4): e355. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.09.166
39. Abhari S., Kawwass J.F. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after transfer of mosaic embryos: a review. J. Clin. Med. 2021; 10(7): 1369. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071369
40. Franasiak J.M. Mosaic embryo transfer: a cautionary tale. F. S. Rep. 2022; 3(3): 179-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2022.07.005
41. Huang K.L., Tsai C.C., Cheng H.H., Huang Y.J., Lai Y.J., Wu C.H. et al. Whether to transfer mosaic embryos: a cytogenetic view of true mosaicism by amniocentesis. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2021; 42(6): 1146-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.03.003

Поступила 18.06.2025

Принята в печать 13.08.2025